Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Could this be stopping my interviews?

Questions on Job Applications about Race and Gender


In today’s diverse workforce there are many new laws in place that most, if not all, of us know very little about. For years, we all were led to believe that it was illegal to ask questions about race and gender and now the government is requiring companies to track the diversity of the applicant pool through anonymous questions at the end of an application. This seems a bit of an about face for a government that usually is as hard to move as a million year old dinosaur.

Of course, dealing with questions on applications really only comes into play if you're getting job leads. If you need to generate more job leads, we recommend getting your resume posted on all the job sites as a good first step. The ResumeDirector service can do this for you. When you sign up and enter your resume on their site, they will post it for you on over 90 job boards including Monster, HotJobs, CareerBuilder, etc. Your resume will be seen by up to 1.5 million recruiters and employers daily.

Another way to get exposed to recruiters quickly is by sending your resume to them directly. The ResumeArrow service lets you email your resume right to the inboxes of thousands of recruiters in your industry and geographic location.

Where does the info go?

The government has very strict guidelines for how this information is handled and the law states that the information is to be used solely for the purposes of analyzing the diversity of the applicant pool for specific companies, for regions, for industries and any other analytical need to ensure that EEO and AAP targets are being met.

So, whether you are filling out a form by hand or entering your information online, you can be 99% sure that the company who is receiving it will make every effort to keep your EEO answers separate from your actual application. If not, the government will penalize them heavily and any individual who was not hired could get as much as one year’s salary in a lawsuit for discrimination if the hiring decision was based on the information provided.

How is the information used?

In an effort to ensure that positions being offered by larger companies to the general public are being offered to and pursued by a diverse group of individuals, the government has put in place reporting requirements that mandate that these companies track this information through voluntary questionnaires.

Of course there are some margins for error built into a voluntary questionnaire. There are also margins for hedging or abuse in that if a company does not get enough female applicants or Asian applicants for a specific position, that company will decide on who they are going to hire without making an offer and keep the job requisition open until the correct number of minority applicants have been recorded.

How does answering these questions affect you?

You can be fairly sure that your information is not being combined with your application to make a decision about hiring. If you ever suspect that this is happening, you should contact the local office for the department of labor.

What it all boils down to is the government is now looking at you as a race or a gender instead of just a number and they are using your race and gender information to turn you back into a number to evaluate EEO and AAP compliance. So guess what?...You have come full circle and are just another number. So, go ahead and answer the questions. Go ahead and help those individuals who are considered minorities to get the same considerations as everyone else in the workforce.



I have often wondered if this is why I am not being called into an interview, am I so different now that I am out? Hopefully this isn't the case but it sure does make you think it is.

3 Comments:

Amy K. said...

This was very informative and helpful, thank you! I wasn't aware of ResumeDirector.

I also have been wondering if I'm too "different" to be hired. Who would want a transsexual network tech? It already seems as if many employers prefer to hire men for that position. I'm neither a man, nor someone who's cisgendered. Discrimination in the hiring process is hard to prove. I can see it now: "Why didn't you hire Amy?" "Well, your honor, she had a poor credit rating." "Your honor, she was very qualified, but I hired so-and-so since he/she was more personable/relaxed/friendly/confident/etc/etc/etc..."

But I can tell you one thing. Let's not ever give up.

alan said...

I'd like to think it's not that...

32 years ago I applied for a machinist job at North Island. My wife was stationed there, I was doing my weekends there; it would have been a nice "fit".

The Lt. Cdr. who interviewed me told me at the end that "I can't tell you that you aren't going to get this job. I can't tell you that you are dead last on my hiring priority list. I can't tell you that the only job you're likely to get on base will be the janitor opening at the Navy Exchange because based on the same priority list, we try and put other applicants in better jobs."

I did get the job at the Exchange...

alan

Anonymous said...

Hang in there! It's rough right now in the Network/Computer Tech field. You WILL find a job, just keep trying!

You don't know me, but I've been following your tale. Just sign me...

Admirer from NW Burbs